International Journal of Advanced Research in Education, Technology and Management (IJARETM) operates under a double-blind peer review model. All articles must pass through a peer review process before publication. The final decision on whether a submission is accepted for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief. This is applicable to all submissions, including those for special issues. Reuse of words must be kept to a minimum, credited, or quoted in the text, and all sources must be cited when they are used. A text similarity below 20% is acceptable by the journal.

About Peer Review

Peer review is a system for evaluating a manuscript's quality before it is published. To assist editors in determining whether an article should be published in their journal, external-independent researchers in the relevant research area analyze submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and significance. The peer review is done by External Reviewers.

Peer reviewers should:

All names and email addresses submitted on this journal website are used solely for the official purposes of the International Journal of AI in Practice. This information will not be shared, disclosed, or made accessible to any third party or used for any purpose other than those explicitly stated.

• Only agree to review submissions for which they have the required subject expertise and can provide an accurate assessment in a timely manner.
• Respect the confidentiality of peer review and do not reveal any details about a manuscript or its review, other than those released by the journal, during or after the peer-review process.
• Not to utilize information obtained during the peer-review process to their own or any other person's or organization's benefit, or to harm or discredit others
• Declare all potential conflicts of interest, and seek help from the journal if they're not sure if something qualifies as a relevant interest.
• not let the origins of a manuscript, the authors' nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender, or other characteristics, or commercial considerations influence their reviews
• be objective and constructive in their reviews, and avoid being hostile or inflammatory, as well as making libellous or derogatory personal remarks
• provide journals with precise and complete personal and professional information that reflects their expertise
• Recognize that impersonating another person during the review process is a serious offense.

The Process

A manuscript is evaluated when it is submitted to a journal to see if it fits the submission standards. If it does, the editorial team will identify possible peer reviewers from the relevant field to assess the work and give recommendations.

The Peer Review followed by IJARETM:

Single Blind Peer Review: The reviewers are aware of the authors' names, but the authors are unaware of who reviewed their manuscript.